Thanks for repo file update. I have fixed this also.
About 6.0.1 repo. For used template file and this repo generated for
RHEL 9 also.
For this repo RPM packages present and correct
https://rpm.kamailio.org/rhel/9/6.0/6.0.1/x86_64/Packages/k/

So 6.0.1 repo still required.

Sergey

On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 08:55 +1000, Patrick Wakano wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> That seems to be working now! Thank you!
> However, there are 2 things, the ipscape.repo file is not updated, so
> the 6.0.2 repo isn't there... also, won't the 6.0.1 version be made
> available anymore in the repo server?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
> 
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 at 13:04, Sergei Safarov <s.safa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have fixed rpm publishing. Now 6.0.2 available.
> > I have also deleted broken repos like 6.0.1.
> > 
> > On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 16:41 +1000, Patrick Wakano wrote:
> > > Hi @Sergey Safarov ,
> > > Sorry for being annoying but the repos 6.x for centos 8 and 9 are
> > > again not showing the packages...
> > > 
> > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/9/6.0/6.0.1/x86_64/
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > Patrick
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 16:15, Patrick Wakano <pwak...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Sergey,
> > > > Thanks very much for that, now it is working fine!
> > > > Just one tiny detail, in the file
> > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/kamailio.repo, the repos for
> > > > 6.0.0 and 6.0.0 have the name as 6.0.2, the rest seems all
> > > > fine!
> > > > 
> > > > > [kamailio-6.0.1]
> > > > > name=Kamailio - 6.0.2 - Packages for the Kamailio 6.0.1
> > > > > release
> > > > > baseurl=
> > > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/$releasever/6.0/6.0.1/$basearch/
> > > > > enabled=0
> > > > > ...
> > > > > 
> > > > > [kamailio-6.0.0]
> > > > > name=Kamailio - 6.0.2 - Packages for the Kamailio 6.0.0
> > > > > release
> > > > > baseurl=
> > > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/$releasever/6.0/6.0.0/$basearch/
> > > > > enabled=0
> > > > > ...
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Patrick
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 17:03, Sergey Safarov
> > > > <s.safa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello Patrick
> > > > > repos for 5.8.6 and 6.0.1 fixed.
> > > > > repo 5.8.5 is still in progress.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 6:52 AM Patrick Wakano
> > > > > <pwak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Thank you for looking into it Sergey, however it doesn't
> > > > > > seem to be fully working....
> > > > > > So, in a lazy approach, we usually do "yum -y install --
> > > > > > enablerepo=kamailio-<version> 'kamailio*'", but now if the
> > > > > > <version> is 6.0.1, it fails with these errors:
> > > > > > > Error: 
> > > > > > >  Problem 1: conflicting requests
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libphonenumber needed by kamailio-
> > > > > > > phonenum-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libgeocoding.so.8()(64bit) needed by
> > > > > > > kamailio-phonenum-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from
> > > > > > > kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libphonenumber.so.8()(64bit) needed
> > > > > > > by kamailio-phonenum-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from
> > > > > > > kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > >  Problem 2: conflicting requests
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libnats needed by kamailio-nats-
> > > > > > > 6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libnats.so.3.8()(64bit) needed by
> > > > > > > kamailio-nats-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from kamailio-
> > > > > > > 6.0.1
> > > > > > >  Problem 3: conflicting requests
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides freeradius-client needed by
> > > > > > > kamailio-radius-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from kamailio-
> > > > > > > 6.0.1
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libfreeradius-client.so.2()(64bit)
> > > > > > > needed by kamailio-radius-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from
> > > > > > > kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > >  Problem 4: conflicting requests
> > > > > > >   - nothing provides libwolfssl.so.42()(64bit) needed by
> > > > > > > kamailio-tls_wolfssl-6.0.1-0.el9.centos.x86_64 from
> > > > > > > kamailio-6.0.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I can see that previously (I was using version 5.6.4), the
> > > > > > repo had more folders containing the needed libs/packages,
> > > > > > which is not the case anymore (apparently since version
> > > > > > 5,8.5). Are these libs now available somewhere else?
> > > > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/9/5.6/5.6.4/x86_64/Packages/
> > > > > > image.png
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/9/5.8/5.8.5/x86_64/Packages/
> > > > > > image.png
> > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 00:34, Sergey Safarov
> > > > > > <s.safa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello Patrick
> > > > > > > Repo fixed could you check.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:15 AM Patrick Wakano via sr-
> > > > > > > dev <sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hello list,
> > > > > > > > Hope everyone is fine.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'm trying to install the latest 6.0.1 version from
> > > > > > > > https://rpm.kamailio.org/centos/ but it doesn't seem to
> > > > > > > > be updated...The latest version available there is the
> > > > > > > > 5.8.5. Version 6.0.0 isn't there as well...
> > > > > > > > Is it still maintained? or just some rpmbuild command
> > > > > > > > missed?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Kamailio - Development Mailing List --
> > > > > > > > sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > > > > > > sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> > > > > > > > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do
> > > > > > > > not reply only to the sender!
> > 
> > 
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!

Reply via email to