oej left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4168)
RFC 7118 only specifies "ws" as a SIP URI parameter in section 5.2. The
distinction for Via header transports says "WS/WSS". It kind of repeats the
old mistake of using the "SIPS" uri to indicate a secure transport. I would
recommend ignoring this as we do in the case of TLS transport for SIP: URI's
and follow the suggestion in this issue.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4168#issuecomment-2706090869
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4168/2706090...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
