I think the code is better how it is because the second parameter of the
function you gave as example in the issue has to be a valid string. In the
current form, it indicates there is a problem with the parameter, rather than
having it silently not doing anything when it was expected to be a change of
the value. As commented in the issue, use sr-users mailing list if you want to
discuss further.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044#issuecomment-2508904860
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044/c2508904...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
