The automatic actions have the purpose to keep the reporter, and devs when it
is the case, engaged. An issue or PR marked `stale` can have the label removed
by reporter if it is still interested in it. Also, a closed issue or PR can be
reopened. Note also that the `stale` label is added based on inactivity period,
comments are considered activity, so the inactivity is reset with each of them..
Have in mind that this is a collaborative project, so everyone have to stay
engaged, nobody pays for time spent by developers on reviewing commits. From
that point of view, I think it is fair that the reporter reacts on a stale or
close notification and indicate that the issue is still there or the PR is
still relevant. Just coming to blame, it is by far not a nice approach. Some of
developers here spent significant resources and time without any direct
benefits over the past 20 years to make this application available, that should
be appreciated. This kind of automatisation tries to make the life easier for
everyone, feel free to propose tools or processes that can help improving and
moving forward.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3475#issuecomment-1826855824
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3475/c1826855...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
