Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > In order to make configuration simpler, how about having a dynamic default > > as I suggested? > > Default is half (hardcoded), but its own parameter gives more > flexibility for granularity -- one extra parameter is not adding much > complexity, imo, and case by case one may want more often checks to > clean up those that end up in timeout.
I didn't suggest to remove the parameter, but change its default value if the parameter is not given. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
