On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 17:16 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > Hi! > Sorry if I’ve brought this up before. Was looking at the package > definitions in our repo today and > did go through Alpine. It’s not following the template set by the > Debian packages,
Correct. It tries to follow (as closely as possible) Makefile.groups Please see https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/main/kamailio/APKBUILD, lines 45-58) > it’s one huge package with all possible dependencies. ? It is one abuild that builds 44 sub packages: https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/main/x86_64/kamailio > > Since there’s a cost and a risk with adding dependencies and very few > Kamailio installs > use all modules this doesn’t look good to me. Alpine tries to follow Makefile.groups which honestly doesn't make sense to me either. > > I personally don’t know the details of Alpine packaging, but can help > trying to define > a set of packages like in Debian and test them in Alpine. See above. > > It would be good for the project overall if we can fix this. Ok. I'm listed as the package manager. > > Btw, the same goes for the docker image that is built with scripts in > the packaging > repository. Being able to minimise the build would be a good thing. > Out of my scope. The docker images people do crazy things. :) > Kamailio greetings! > /O Kamailio is a Hawaiian word for to "talk, converse" - Yeah, let's talk, my friend. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
