Ah OK - understood. Thanks for the explanation. Robin
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 12:17, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 20/01/24 02:05, Robin Carlisle wrote: > > > > I do have 1 followup question which I think is unrelated, let me know if > > etiquette demands I create a new post for this. When I test using > > chromium browser, chromium sends OPTION requests- which I think is > > something to do with CORS. These always cause cache MISS from squid,.. > > I think because the return code is 204...? > > > > No, the reason is HTTP specification (RFC 9110 section 9.3.7): > "Responses to the OPTIONS method are not cacheable." > > If these actually are CORS (might be several other things also), then > there is important differences in the response headers per-visitor. > These cannot be cached, and Squid does not know how to correctly > generate for those headers. So having Squid auto-respond is not a good > idea. > > > Cheers > Amos > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
