ESI in Squid hasn't had investment done to it for neigh on twenty years now. Not a bad run 🙂. I have no idea if there are users out there... Certainly no one has reached out to me about it for many years.
I think newer models of edge compute like WASM and ICAP are generally better: narrower interfaces that unlock huge potential. The implementation in Squid should be savable if folk are interested - I don't remember it being all that bad - but I certainly don't have time to offer to do that. HTH, Rob On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 23:50, Alex Rousskov < rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > Hello, > > ESI support in Squid has been a significant source of problems for > many years. One of the biggest problems is affecting a lot of code that > has nothing to do with the ESI module! I see no signs of a significant > ESI user base, but some users may still exist. Before proposing to > remove ESI support from Squid, I would like to better estimate the > negative impact of that removal on existing Squid installations. > > If your Squid installation uses ESI features, please respond (in private > if necessary). How would ESI removal affect your Squids? Would you be > willing and able to rewrite the ESI module integration with Squid > primary APIs (or hire a developer capable of such a serious project)? > > > Thank you, > > Alex. > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users