On 6/25/21 8:01 PM, squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: >>> Insufficient demand for that feature does not allow me to provide a >>> reliable ETA at this time.
>> Do you have a vague idea of the cost of the developement of this >> feature ? > I'm not sure why Alex is offering a feature. A change to helper > annotations was already implemented in Squid-5 to avoid this exact > behaviour you are seeing. The feature I was describing (without really offering anything) was cache_peer_access support for slow ACLs. That missing feature is orthogonal to helper annotations that you are talking about. Hope this clarifies, Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
