Below I leave the link. I think that with this you could achieve your goal. In this project there are more things that you might not want to use or maybe you do. To begin I believe that it is well.
- High availability load balancing frontend between users and backend proxy nodes. - VIP (floating IP) for the load balancers. - Automatic configuration script for internal routing. - Proxy pool with integrated Kerberos and LDAP authentication in Active Directory - Domain, IP, and port filtering - Active Directory group browsing permissions - Navigation reports by cost centers and/or individual users - Bandwidth usage control per user. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L3HiYs0LXaDZJOEHXVz8WrRFeJXXUBzU/view?usp=sharing Any question you may have, please reply with a copy to SQUID's mailing list in order to share with the community of users information that they may find useful. Best regards, Gabriel El mié., 30 de sep. de 2020 a la(s) 05:12, Rafał Stanilewicz ( r...@fomar.com.pl) escribió: > Hi Gabriel, > > although I do not know Spanish, a few of my friends do. Also, the most > important pieces will be code samples, which do not need translation. So if > you would be so kind and share the manual with me, I'd appreciate it very > much! > > Rafal > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:07, Service MV <service...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rafal, if you wish I've a manual redacted in SPANISH for build a VM >> whit Debian 10.5 running SQUID compiled from source, with kerberos and LDAP >> authentication, plus AD groups authorizations. >> >> I haven't had time to translate it into English yet. >> Let me know if it works for you and I'll share it with you. >> >> Best regards, >> Gabriel >> >> >> >> >> El lun., 28 sep. 2020 10:19, Rafał Stanilewicz <r...@fomar.com.pl> >> escribió: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm planning the deployment of web proxy in my environment. It's not >>> very big, around 80 typical windows 10 workstations, active directory, plus >>> some DMZ servers. For now, there is very basic L7 inspection on the edge >>> firewall. >>> >>> I plan to use two separate squid instances, one for explicit proxy >>> traffic, forced by AD GPO settings, and second for traffic still being sent >>> directly to the Internet (as several applications we use tend to ignore the >>> system proxy settings). The first instance will use (hopefully) AD >>> authentication, while the second will use only srcIP-based rules. I will be >>> grateful for any comments, what should I focus on, or some quirks - I've >>> never deployed squid from scratch. >>> >>> But my main point of writing is: >>> >>> I'd like to get some numbers about squid-introduced latency of getting >>> some particular web resource. Is there any benchmarking program I could >>> use? I'd like to see what is the current latency of getting the resource >>> without any proxying, then of getting the same resource with explicit proxy >>> settings, then of implicit (intercepting) proxy option, as well as for >>> different options of caching. >>> >>> How should I start? Is there any software I can use to measure that, >>> besides analysis of HAR files? >>> >>> So far, I used squid only in home environment, and without a need for >>> granular measurement. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Rafal Stanilewicz >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> squid-users mailing list >>> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org >>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >>> >> > > -- > Zanim wydrukujesz, pomyśl o środowisku. >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
