On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 18/05/18 04:32, Panagiotis Bariamis wrote: > >> Hello , > >> Only thing I have found concerning the subject is this 4 years old > thread : > >> > >>>From: Amos Jeffries > >>>Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:46:09 +1200 > >>> > >>>I have implemented Bearer authentication support in Squid and have found > >>>a noticible lack of support in clients for the 407 status Proxy-Auth* > >>>headers, even where Bearer support is advertized and working via 401 > >>>status WWW-Auth*. > >>> > >>>Can any of the client implementers (Browsers in particular) please point > >>>out if they do support Bearer login to a proxy and what restrictions > >>>they have on it actually working? > >>> > >>>Amos Jeffries > >>>The Squid Software Foundation > >>> > >> Does anyone know if browsers have implemented since then support for > >> bearer authentication for Proxy-Auth ? > >> > > >AFAIK the situation has not changed. Except that there are now several > >CDN providers using Bearer authentication in reverse-proxies. > > > >I have been keeping the auth-bearer branch up to date with Squid-5. So > >if you wish to try it out it should work okay (and safely). You will > >need to provide your own authentication helper to interface with > >whatever OAuth systems you use. > > >Amos > > Thank you very much for the info .
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
