On 10/04/18 22:32, Omid Kosari wrote: > Hello, > > squid-top-domains.JPG > <http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/file/t93386/squid-top-domains.JPG> > > > This image shows stats from one of my squid boxes . I have question about > highlighted ones . I think they should have better hit ratio because they > are popular between clients .
There are no URLs in that image. There are only wildcards for top-level domains and a HIT % over the *entire* domain. To figure out whether any of them should actually have better HIT ratios you have to look at the actual URLs and see how much uniqueness exists there. Then for the _full_ URLs (scheme, domain, path, *and* ?query portions) which are not very unique look at the response headers to see why they are not caching well. The tool at redbot.org can help with that last part. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
