I mean SSL bump in explicit mode. So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump?
Em ter, 13 de mar de 2018 às 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas < uh...@fantomas.sk> escreveu: > On 13.03.18 13:44, Danilo V wrote: > >Is it possible/feasible to configure squid in explicit mode with ssl > >intercept? > > explicit is not intercept, intercept is not explicit. > > explicit is where browser is configured (manually or automatically via > WPAD) > to use the proxy. > > intercept is where network device forcifully redirects http/https > connections > to the proxy. > > maybe you mean SSL bump in explicit mode? > > >Due to architecture of my network it is not possible to implement > >transparent proxy. > > excuse me? > by "transparent" people mean what we usually call "intercept". > > >What would be the behavior of applications that dont support proxy - i.e. > >dont forward requests to proxy? > > they mest be intercepted. > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0... > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
