Ah. My bad. Correctly Defence in depth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_in_depth_(computing)
11.02.2018 02:29, Yuri пишет: > No. This reason is obviously not strong enough. As by as requirement > configure firewalls also on servers - whenever they placed. Security in > depth - did you hear this term? > > > 11.02.2018 02:26, Peng Yu пишет: >>> What is your reason for wanting "no restrictions"? >> The proxied servers are behind a firewall already, which protect them >> from any unwanted access. Is this reason strong enough to have no >> restrictions set? >> -- ***************************** * C++20 : Bug to the future * *****************************
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
