On 12/07/17 10:34, Yuri wrote:
12.07.2017 3:25, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
Hey,
If you are using a single process ie not SMP(default) use aufs instead of diskd
cache_dir.
It's much more stable and efficient then diskd(to my knowledge).
>
Not sure about you knowledge. Diskd is simple designed for another OS
than Linux. On appropriate platform it is not only stable, but quite
efficient than aufs. :)
Not quite. AUFS was supposed to succeed diskd since it allows far
greater parallelism, however it often does not work very well on
BSD-like systems and nobody managed to fix it yet.
The latest BSDs threading does handle AUFS better than older ones do
though so YMMV.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
