Okay, cool — thanks for clarifying. Guess I'll nuke it myself and reinitialise a blank one.
Best, Dan On 19 May 2017 at 23:29, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 19/05/17 15:47, Dan Charlesworth wrote: > >> Hey all >> >> I'm fairly new to rock caching. With aufs, if you reduce the cache size >> in the config it'll start slowly reducing it down the new size. >> >> I've done that with a ~137GB rock store (reduced it to 10240MB) but it >> 'aint changing after reloading the config. >> > > With UFS/AUFSdiskd the cache is stored in a directory tree with individual > files per item. Reducing the size results in files being deleted from disk > an the total size shrinks naturally without any special action by Squid. > > Rock on the other hand has all content stored inside one file. That file > gets initialized with the space configured and maybe grown if needed. But > there is nothing I'm aware of to reinitialize it on smaller sizes being > configured. Reducing the size does reduce the size of stuff using space > *inside* the database file, but AFAIK not the file itself. > > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > -- Getbusi p +61 3 6165 1555 e d...@getbusi.com w getbusi.com
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
