Hey Steve,

Deployed a 3.5.20 build with both of those patches and have noticed a big 
improvement in memory consumption of squid processes at a couple of 
splice-heavy sites.

Thank you, sir!

Dan

> On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:05 PM, Steve Hill <st...@opendium.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>        This sounds very similar to Squid bug 4508. Factory proposed a fix
>>    for that bug, but the patch is for Squid v4. You may be able to adapt it
>>    to v3. Testing (with any version) is very welcomed, of course:
> 
> Thanks for that - I'll look into adapting and testing it.
> 
> (been chasing this bug off and on for months - hadn't spotted that there was 
> a bug report open for it :)
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Steve Hill
>   Technical Director
>   Opendium Limited     http://www.opendium.com
> 
> Sales / enquiries:
>   Email:            sa...@opendium.com
>   Phone:            +44-1792-824568 / sip:sa...@opendium.com
> 
> Support:
>   Email:            supp...@opendium.com
>   Phone:            +44-1792-825748 / sip:supp...@opendium.com
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Reply via email to