On 18 April 2016 at 20:14, Nick Rogers <ncrog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Odhiambo Washington <odhia...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Amos, >> >> All noted. >> >> Lemme consult with some FreeBSD guys on these . >> > > As a FreeBSD user, here's my two cents. > > You should be using the www/squid port. > > If the port doesn't compile with the options you wish, open a problem > report with FreeBSD and/or ask on the FreeBSD ports mailing list. The > maintainer of the www/squid port is pretty responsive and helpful. > > I don't have any issues with www/squid on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. > > That much I know, and love, but this box was running squid-2.7.9 for years and was in production servicing about 100 users. I wasn't going to do 'make install' from the port and cause disruption. Plus I came to realize only later that 3.2.16 was the www/squid. For the record, I like playing with new software manually, compiling by hand and testing before deploying. That's why I was struggling with this 'by hand'. Also note that my FreeBSD version was 8.4 (EoL).
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft."
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
