ok, thank you all so much! 2015-09-09 10:40 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool <marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>:
> It seems that your system is finally getting healthy. > > The fact that the resident memory is 371 MB means that you have no disk > cache or Squid is hardly used, or both. > But look at that red 6.4GB virtual memory which indicates that Squid can > grow to 6.4 GB and even more when it is used. > > So next step is to start using the proxy and monitor the process size. > > Marcus > > > On 09/09/2015 10:24 AM, Jorgeley Junior wrote: > >> changed cache_mem to 3GB, after one hour, this is my htop: >> >> >> >> 2015-09-09 9:39 GMT-03:00 Jorgeley Junior <jorge...@gmail.com <mailto: >> jorge...@gmail.com>>: >> >> changed cache_mem to 3GB, after one hour, this is my htop: >> >> >> >> 2015-09-09 9:34 GMT-03:00 Jorgeley Junior <jorge...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jorge...@gmail.com>>: >> >> changed cache_mem to 3GB, after one hour, this is my htop: >> >> >> >> 2015-09-08 21:43 GMT-03:00 Jorgeley Junior <jorge...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jorge...@gmail.com>>: >> >> ok, I'll do it >> >> 2015-09-08 21:30 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool < >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>>: >> >> >> >> On 09/08/2015 09:23 PM, Jorgeley Junior wrote: >> >> ok, read that already, i set cache_mem to 5GB, so is >> not ok? >> >> >> No. Squid will use more than 6 GB with cache_mem set to 5 >> GB. >> I suggest that you use 2500 MB and after Squid runs for 1 >> hour, see what the total process size is. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> 2015-09-08 20:25 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool < >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>>>: >> >> >> >> On 09/08/2015 10:39 AM, Jorgeley Junior wrote: >> >> I have 8GB physical memory and my swap is >> 32GB. >> I didn't increase the swap yet, should I? >> >> >> You must start with reading the memory FAQ: >> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory >> >> The general rule for all processes applies: make >> sure that a process is *not* larger than 80% of the physical memory. >> In your case, you must reduce cache_mem and make >> sure that Squid does not use more than 6 GB. >> >> A swap of 32 GB is fine for a system with 8 GB >> physical memory. >> >> I also suggest to consider a memory upgrade. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> 2015-09-08 9:23 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool < >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>>>>: >> >> >> >> On 09/08/2015 08:11 AM, Jorgeley Junior >> wrote: >> >> Thank you all, this is the output: >> vm.overcommit_memory = 0 >> vm.swappiness = 60 >> I have a Redhat 6.6 >> >> >> The value of vm.overcommit_memory is OK. >> The default value for vm.swappiness is >> way too high. It means that Linux swaps out parts of processes when they >> are idle for a while. >> For better overall system performance, >> you want those processes in memory as long as possible and not swapped out >> so I recommend to change it to 15. >> This implies that the OS has 15% of the >> physical memory available for file system buffers which is plenty. >> >> You only mentioned that the swap is 32 >> GB. What is the size of the physical memory ? >> >> Did you already increase the swap ? >> >> Marcus >> >> >> 2015-09-05 15:08 GMT-03:00 Marcus >> Kool <marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>>> >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>> >> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com> <mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com <mailto: >> marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com>>>>>: >> >> On Linux, an important sysctl >> parameter that determines how Linux behaves with respect to VM allocation >> is vm.overcommit_memory (should be 0). >> And vm.swappiness is important >> to tune servers (should be 10-15). >> >> Which version of Linux do you >> have and what is the output of >> sysctl -a | grep -e >> vm.overcommit_memory -e vm.swappiness >> >> Marcus >> >> >> On 09/04/2015 07:04 PM, >> Jorgeley Junior wrote: >> >> Thanks Amos, i will >> increase the swap >> >> Em 04/09/2015 17:22, "Amos >> Jeffries" <squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz>> >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz>>> >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz>> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz>>>> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz >> >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz>> >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz>>> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz>> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz> <mailto: >> squ...@treenet.co.nz >> <mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz>>>>>> >> escreveu: >> >> On 5/09/2015 7:16 >> a.m., Jorgeley Junior wrote: >> > Thanks Amos, my >> swap is 32GB, so that's causing the error as you said. >> > Which is the >> better choice: increase the swap size or reduce the >> > cache_mem??? >> > >> >> Both probably. 128 GB >> swap I suspect you will need. >> >> Increase the swap so >> the system lets Squid use more virtual memory. >> >> Decrease the >> cache_mem so that Squid does not actually end up using the >> swap for its main >> worker processes. That is a real killer for performance. >> >> >> Amos >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>> >> <mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>>> >> <mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org >> <mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>> >> <mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>>>> >> >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>> >> <mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>>> >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org>> >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org <mailto: >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *_ >> _* >> *_ >> _* >> > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > --
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
