On 15/07/2015 9:59 p.m., Stakres wrote:
> Yury,
> 
> you mean that having the DISKD 52 times slower then AUFS with linux OS is
> normal ?
> I cannot believe that, incredible !
> 
> I could understand the double or the triple, but here we're speaking about
> 50+ times... 

Yes. Exactly so.

The difference is threading:
 diskd has 1 I/O thread.
 AUFS has 64 I/O threads.

On a 1:1 thread comparison AUFS logics is very slightly slower, but in
aggregate its orders of magnitude faster.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Reply via email to