Hey Eliezer I don't actually use SMP. I could be wrong about the aufs thing; I haven't personally tested—and don't currently plan to test—any other cache types. I just gleaned that from the comments in the bug reports.
Kind regards Dan On 20 March 2015 at 13:45, Eliezer Croitoru <elie...@ngtech.co.il> wrote: > Hey Dan and John, > > If indeed this bug is only for UFS\AUFS cache_dir then I would try to make > sure that large-rock will not sustain the same issue. > > I have not seen in any of the bug reports anything that would reproduce > the issue. > To make sure the issue is understood and can or cannot be reproduced using > ufs\aufs will give one direction. > I would try to test large rock in my next testing round with SMP but if > anyone has some option to test it first I will be glad if it will be done > to make sure ufs\aufs is the culprit. > > Also if indeed it's with aufs\ufs only with SMP then it means that the > issue is related to the way SMP can make a ufs\aufs cache_dir dirty and > there for the answer would be pretty simple to the issue in hands. > > Eliezer > > On 20/03/2015 00:32, Dan Charlesworth wrote: > >> Hi John >> >> This bug has been affecting me on an off for a while as well. I believe it >> only affects aufs and, unfortunately, has been around for years. >> >> See:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3279 >> And see:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483 >> > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
