On 6/7/07, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have just started to use FTS2 and it is working well but I would like to ask any other users if they have had good or bad experiences and why they would use FTS2 rather than FTS1. The software is new and I have not seen any feedback at this stage and we are yet to apply large data sets and high volumes of transactions.
The entire fts subproject was only begun about a year ago, meaning that fts2 has existed for much longer than fts1 had when it was released - fts2 has certainly had more thorough testing at this point. I can't think of any good reason to use fts1 at this point. Admittedly, I haven't updated the wiki with this info. I'll put that on my list to get done. -scott ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
