The discussion on https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/spyderlib/5tw2ZItlxUM remind me of http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=816. Google code clearly lacks functionalities compared to Bitbucket and Github (the main one being pull requests, I think). In addition to this is the eventuality to shift to git instead of mercurial.
Disclaimer: I'm currently a git user so I'm biased and I don't know mercurial very well >From the tip of my head, here are the pros and cons I can find for each service : *Bitbucket/Mercurial*+ Uses mercurial and git. This allows to keep mercurial as VCS. + TortoiseHg - less users *Github/Git*- Git only + numpy, scipy, ipython and matplotlib use it + more users - tracker data has a proprietary format (but is it important ?) There is also the possibility to have read/write mirror I guess, but I have no clue of how it works... Why I prefer Git over Mercurial : + 2-stage commits helps to check the correctness of commits + easy selection line by line or block by block instead of whole files for commits (using git gui) + git stash -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
