Kyle, my recommendation is to put a gauge on the BFP test port ahead of the 
1st check valve. Se what the static pressure is, then turn on the pump and see 
what the loss across the BFP is. We are on the same track. Plus the water 
authorities will charge to put the gauge on the hydrant.   
  
  
  
  
Todd Williams     

  
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
  
Stonington, CT
  
860-608-4559
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Jun 25, 2025 at 4:06 PM,  <Kyle.Montgomery 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>           
>   
>
> Put a gauge on the closest hydrant (or two) and have someone monitor that 
> while you flow the pump. If the gauge on the hydrant stays above 20 psi, then 
> you know that most of the loss is coming between the city main and the fire 
> pump. That could help narrow down your search for partially-closed valves 
> and/or obstructions in the pipe.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> -Kyle M @ Aero
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> From:   Fpdcdesign  <[email protected]>
>   Sent:  Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:53 AM
>   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> <[email protected]>
>   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: [EXTERNAL] Backflow turbulence
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
> The 38 psi is the static pressure from a recent flow test taken at elevation 
> 302. The ground at the entrance to the building is approximately 305. The 
> flow was about 1100 gpm at 28.   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> The backflow is a 6” Febco. The fire pump is a vertical in-line, so my guess 
> is that the maximum rated is about 500 gpm. Even at 150%, the friction loss 
> should only be 3.5 psi, per the literature. They can’t get to rated without 
> the suction pressure below 20 psi
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
>
>   
>   
>
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Stonington, CT
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>
>   
>   
>
>
>   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > On Jun 24, 2025 at 12:31 PM,  <Mike Morey (mailto:[email protected])>  
> > wrote:
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > What size/model backflow and flow rate?    Many N shaped RPZs are up around 
> > 15 psi loss when you’re running them at the kind of flows a 150% test would 
> > see for a given suction size pump.    Also the larger units never drop 
> > below about a 10 psi loss no matter what.    If you’re losing that much at 
> > or near churn I’d suspect a problem with the backflow itself.
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >  Mike Morey
> >
> >   
> >
> >  2025 NFSA Top Tech Champion • NICET IV • CFPS
> >
> >   
> >
> >  Project Estimator    • Fire Protection Group
> >  Shambaugh  &  Son, LP    an EMCOR Company
> >
> >   
> >
> >  7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
> >
> >   
> >
> >  direct    260.487.7824  /    cell  260.417.0625  
> >  email    [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> >   24/7 (outlook-data-detector://2/)   SERVICE LINE   888.217.7055 
> > (tel:888.217.7055)
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > From:   Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> >   Sent:  Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:17 PM
> >   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> > <[email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])>
> >   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: [EXTERNAL] Backflow turbulence
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > The water supply tested in the street to 38 psi with less than 5 ft 
> > elevation to the pump room. The suction pressure they are getting during 
> > the pump test is 15 Todd Williams Fire Protection Design/Consulting 
> > Stonington, CT 860-608-4559 On Jun
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  This Message Is From an External Sender
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  This message originated outside your organization.
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > The water supply tested in the street to 38 psi with less than 5 ft 
> > elevation to the pump room. The suction pressure they are getting during 
> > the pump test is 15
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Todd Williams   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Stonington, CT
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > 860-608-4559
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > On Jun 24, 2025 at 11:39 AM,  <Craig Prahl 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Are suction pressures low due to the water supply?    Since there is a 
> > > BFP, I assume you’re drawing from a city service, correct?    Got any 
> > > data on that system?   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >  Craig Prahl    |Jacobs     | Fire Protection SME – EV, AM, DC, Special 
> > > Hazards
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >  [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])|www.jacobs.com 
> > > (https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.jacobs.com/__;!!KZTdOCjhgt4hgw!-_khxU8gU0_6jc895I7kRbnU8JghRDsWgqOblZ4jr7Qp2IVbR30VYw_hWvNFtphnl0uWpB9KIvbYi1pvZz4$)
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > > 1041 East Butler Road      Greenville, South Carolina    29606
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > > CONTACT BY: Phone 1-864-676-5252, Email or MS TEAMS
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > From:   Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> > >   Sent:  Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:45 AM
> > >   To:  Sprinklerforum  <[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>
> > >   Subject:  [EXTERNAL] [Sprinklerforum] Backflow turbulence
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > I am working on an untestable fire pump with an “N” shaped RPZ in the 
> > > suction line. They (just) have the 10X diameter distance on the feed, but 
> > > the suction pressures are very low (15 psi). It seems that an “N” shaped 
> > > device would create a lost
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > I am working on an untestable fire pump with an “N” shaped RPZ in the 
> > > suction line. They (just) have the 10X diameter distance on the feed, but 
> > > the suction pressures are very low (15 psi). It seems that an “N” shaped 
> > > device would create a lost more turbulence than a standard straight one. 
> > > Consequently, should the distance of straight pipe requirement be greater 
> > > for this arrangement?   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Todd G Williams, PE
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Stonington, CT
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >  860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >  860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >  860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >     
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >  NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged 
> > > information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any 
> > > viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by 
> > > unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> > > message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message 
> > > and deleting it from your computer.
> > > _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > > mailing list:   
> > > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> > >  
> > > (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org__;!!FaxH778!YPJnKEAAeBMNczQSgCWFRVOmkW4hd70Wt4L4gQOqqbgjvlufzro1mlFMbuTfzlf0lzI9yTjd5rIepp0F9z8$)
> > >   To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > > [email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain 
> > confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No 
> > confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If 
> > you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all 
> > copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the 
> > sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, 
> > print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
> > recipient.
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > mailing list:   
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> >
> >   
> >   
>   
>   
>   
>  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> mailing list: 
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>   
  
  
     
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to