Steve, I understand your point but the IBC says Secondary water supply. Thus a 
second water supply as a backup to the main or primary supply. 403.3.3 
describes : An additional fire
pump shall not be required for the secondary water supply
unless needed to provide the minimum design intake pressure
at the suction side of the fire pump supplying the
automatic sprinkler system.

This is describing how the piping arrangement should be for this tank and pump. 
Which is exactly how we have done it here.

Anthony Carrizosa
Project Manager | Fire Protection
7855 S 206th St Kent, WA 98032
Cell: 206-679-5283 | Office Dir: 253-341-4593
[cid:[email protected]]
https://archerconstruction.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2farcherconstruction.com%2f&c=E,1,Wdb65AWzMgSBzW3HDw91SfcRQCtxDUQKoJf-UowQ-WnB_WMosgG-8W7eLePJ42PwWQvLiQx16Pls052VqwHO7tKm-_u5AnWly0ewkNiMkxn-AjQb1JI,&typo=1>



From: Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 12:29 PM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe PRV Question

I think you’re blurring 403.3.2 and 403.3.3.  If you need two separate city 
connections based on building height,  you can still fill a break tank with 
supply lines connected to separate main legs as prescribed.   403.3.3 doesn’t 
say anything about the connection configuration of pump to tank or 
primary/secondary or anything that prescriptively triggers two separate 
connections.   UNLESS  you take suction directly from a city main and then have 
to make a separate connection to a tank.   Using a break tank checks all the 
boxes IMHO, as you stabilize the suction pressure, you have redundancy, you 
have (barring catastrophe) a reliable water supply AND it’s all a lot simpler 
to design, build and maintain.   That last part is the most important and what 
we’re ultimately seeking with a standpipe water supply is adequacy and 
reliability.   Of course all of this assumes rigorous ITM to make sure it’s 
full, but I reiterate that the point of the secondary water supply is to hedge 
against interruption of the primary and assure an adequate water supply.   Not 
two adequate water supplies, just one.   The break tank resolves and the 
disparate discharge pressure issue that Micah originally asked about.


The foregoing is my opinion only and does not represent NFPA or the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor intended to serve as an interpretation of the standard.

Protection Design and Consulting
Steve Leyton, President
T  |  619.255.8964 x 102  |  
www.protectiondesign.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.protectiondesign.com%2f&c=E,1,7iJVcUuAF8ZKnXHZjK8eyiF8zCNQG-7SAUydaO1o97hPOgjCJRGsQdM4qkmWX0Y3no64UZsTs6Le1EFsd_UKl_cPjlVVI2-XmpKyqNDPiBFbitK3gQOYBaU,&typo=1>
2851 Camino Del Rio South  |  Suite 210  |  San Diego, CA  92108
Fire Protection System Design | Consulting | Planning | Training








From: Brett Peters <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 12:11 PM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe PRV Question

Steve, I understand the argument but I think that eliminates having two 
supplies to the fire pump, if you are only filling the tank and using the tank 
as the sole supply to the fire pump then you only have on supply, what happens 
if in the case of some type of event you actually lose the tank but have city 
water supply, you need the the city supply supplying the fire pump as well as 
the tank or you essentially are still looking at only one supply to the fire 
pump and assuming that the tank will never fail as opposed to having city 
supply and tank supply to the pump which would be 2 independent sources.


Thanks

Brett Peters
General Manager Installation & Design
Proudline Fire Protection Services Ltd.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
780 490 7602 office ext 202
780 490 7605 fax
780 777 0568 cell
780 718 2676 24h
Visit us at 
www.proudline.ca<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.proudline.ca%2f&c=E,1,1NsijbXVCEBf7jB_QoCvtLGqqs5-IgC9fpF8VG7lTanHslrEd_Z_VcB3Tlt0B6ZVwsqVAyTK_i-Au5qHXia4yRYpjHqefJYXfNaV-RTgagTLhWOBtwMlzGu5sZ3t&typo=1>

Proudline now offers ULc listed monitoring services, please contact 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for more information



[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4wRo6r0eNDUWx8YR-4XJLvwcnouQn_xEZH_HIb4jDbepWtON2RWC-ekzvZHKtncFOQqPcNQfzM&c=E,1,lU6SDPoaAkvAA2UYpLNRmPMrRP665B93eqm1uWRO9wHH9hFslrfep8Fya6JO6q7z4mzCa0FasqDWMXhxFSIRWJ1YHu7kZwOLNmP-cndu&typo=1]
 
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4yJVI287VPLDWiW9maE2Np3U4CdszCY9deeyaLl8DM90wlBd7pnuOZV9U-swv-7gWN_24py6vo&c=E,1,GL7DbiXzAqMTZd7n1rIhsGb2KS_HHRh6XKuE1elQqm54naaD8RPlvtmjor8DqYunDpRE7hbJqIOQEFScoNjb0kMnmq3qTgdaVuqvS3PYm5YI&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4wlGmqj6Ja06DKOIMLPvEE8B2W8fT_TPPA3w-4JfqygLq9n77ECSni09YLIVICXJYzWo4Z0PjU&c=E,1,a5op7fG_aGruwD4bryirA9GHFQJD0PPD02sW__66AIEa-HLgsU_Lkr6VA2-K8uLNZjZp0EfrHMm00WYPt7jUvj2FV0OiueAolkfFuU383LbumCZ4Bm56-Q0I0g,,&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4zEgPbs279KVEfWIpIiWNLel8zAlcloW9dNXGLTaE1cMz88CRkmg17fju5BQB_iIzhWK20DUL8&c=E,1,iA9dVwtrugDX5Jqk6BlQ31oMAFS4NidbH6t9kqrUOVx4gdFUFPXHNoE-XGVMyunn_74-py5Uq_wsDm8-_SjuCjv2SBI9_lvVBVnRQryikQhaIA,,&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4z7J0kfmSGA8jKvDK0pTqW3KQlc5v-tYcWosmy5W7pdok462Gzu_9Ft7UK9oJUWDT1DzhQ4hUU&c=E,1,Co47-ZWgOd9bkbk7AA2JaqhhlexfU1iPtVUrRsWzGwBEJITPXsdZ8pDhdakslty08GrG0RHG-_2MI9u34g_hO9Yqaq29_ax_Wap-lbKVDJfFeA,,&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4wTVHoTZxkppBoWSCTFnGLgGTq0apivi8sNvWPyBsloO0mmy8ZYu4Ax854jo7ihTMFyeYeOceg&c=E,1,hctUwV8jm5s3IHmxY-aRi4l_nafr4ver5tUVtGM-jgtupEmLBP1FKSvFAb6siFJU_YVADNuAodh8JbReAtlpIWg-P8AHfU3eVMoDZG_ApxlKAiiZJw,,&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4xwBWEOX5v9mpza4Jqf9lOKSwThBNvyIO7Rl-Cxo7NRiV7p70C0f1biwbh44Y-iIA5GcmD1MCo&c=E,1,BGZHzGuzX9TScs-tLZfOlcSckcYP6aPNHl3UD5w5VjoYDmAoOvDZHxVh27o958j2Oh0QpNWnP1Kl1kYdsSI7YG0Kt05uh3P-b4ocilSXXg,,&typo=1]
  
[https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fci3.googleusercontent.com%2fmail-sig%2fAIorK4yPfO1HdtbQPYiKlYE38cwc88ABhX7xN1nh0fCK5LjFXjKplJggk3Xn6_XypmtMWyADKR7ZRGk&c=E,1,1pDbokWHlR_Fgq1DFTafB6tdVSFM8pYOcZutarXY5ndCB7Q0Uld8Jw_ZsphkG5iJQFTTAXFPX8Zs0BA1SVtRKKjjdstwYHAuiH9lPe6U&typo=1]


On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:05 PM Steve Leyton 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Respectfully don’t concur.

The point of the tank is to store a reserve of standpipe water or sprinkler 
water, whichever volume is highest given demand x duration.   This requirement 
is intended to mitigate interruption of the primary water supply (city main) 
due to a cataclysmic seismic event that might damage the service lateral or 
public system.  Assuming it’s sized correctly, you start with a full tank and 
the pump begins drafting and almost immediately, the autofill opens.  We use 6” 
fill lines, so once its open, the fill line will either maintain the tank level 
or augment it.   If at some point the supply to the tank is interrupted, you at 
least have tank water for the calculated duration at full demand.

Even if the public (fill) supply is interrupted before the pump operates, you 
still have a full tank at the start.  Which is the point, to assure an adequate 
water supply for the duration of an activation.  Not two separate (and 
potentially concurrent) water supplies, just a back-up to assure that you have 
one reliable one.   And you won’t have that if you’re drafting just from the 
city main and it gets interrupted, so I think this arrangement is consistent 
with the intent.   And all the AHJ’s out here in Earthquake Country seem to 
agree, as this is a fairly standard arrangement.

The foregoing is my opinion only and does not represent NFPA or the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor intended to serve as an interpretation of the standard.

Protection Design and Consulting
Steve Leyton, President
T  |  619.255.8964 x 102  |  
www.protectiondesign.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.protectiondesign.com%2f&c=E,1,P7PgE3GWFPUsuwMpzUW3UCWhSmZZfEE5HxEAe2YZjJdXIHEux1WyEVGjiT-UIzrZcEH7jfcTZ4rqE8qCCb6D_ZDVGVpWox1ffiRSFbzKozF3xaOEdQ,,&typo=1>
2851 Camino Del Rio South  |  Suite 210  |  San Diego, CA  92108
Fire Protection System Design | Consulting | Planning | Training







From: Travis Mack <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 9:47 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe PRV Question

In my opinion, that is not dual water supplies. If the tank is down your water 
supply is down. You need one connected to the city and one connected to the 
tank. Yes. It can be quite tough to balance that calc. I’ve had to put a PRV on 
the incoming line so as to basically kill most of the supply pressure.


Travis Mack, SET

M.E.P.CAD |

181 N. Arroyo Grande Blvd. #105 I Henderson, NV 89074

www.mepcad.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mepcad.com%2f&c=E,1,tTUL7JkZqziqUaEH6jOEKQEeClGvVoGTo6D1TqGsrGswCbuHR7NwlMKAXDajI_GCV7zHhBqwfyRfbw6XwWagD8xI5fkoPs3uHMcIg4ru&typo=1>
 | m: 480.547.9348



AutoSPRINK  |  AutoSPRINK FAB  |  AutoSPRINK RVT  |  AlarmCAD



Book appointment time in my calendar

https://calendly.com/t_mack_mepcad

________________________________
From: Micah Davis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 9:17:40 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe PRV Question

Thank you for the response, Steve!  Does the redundant fill valves for the tank 
satisfy the secondary supply requirement of the IBC without an additional tank? 
 I was interpreting the city main connected to the pump as the primary supply 
and the tank as the secondary supply (or vice versa).  If my interpretation is 
wrong and the tank with redundant fill valves meets BOTH the primary and 
secondary water supply requirements, I can NOT connect the city water main to 
the fire pump, and the problem is solved using your method above.

Am I tracking correctly?

My thought is that if the city main stays connected to the pump and my demand 
calcs and PRV settings are based on the supply from the tank (which I think is 
correct), how do we avoid overpressurization with the added pressure from the 
city?  I'm probably overthinking this somewhere!  That tends to be my M.O.!


Micah Davis

Ferguson Fire Design

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:02 PM Steve Leyton 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Micah:

The best way to stabilize the pump discharge pressure and give yourself a 
(nearly) straight line suction pressure curve is to arrange the required 
secondary water supply as a break tank.   Fill the tank with city water 
(recommend to manifold at least one automatic plus one manual fill; in my neck 
of the woods we use two automatic and one manual) and base  your calculations 
on the lowest potential water level in the tank.  We simply use the pump’s 
performance curve as a water supply assuming 0 psi suction head.   Depending on 
water column height, your actual discharge pressure variation will be  ≤ 5 psi, 
unless the tank is uniquely configured and multi-story.





The foregoing is my opinion only and does not represent NFPA or the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor intended to serve as an interpretation of the standard.



Protection Design and Consulting

Steve Leyton, President

T  |  619.255.8964 x 102  |  
www.protectiondesign.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.protectiondesign.com%2f&c=E,1,UrpIlKE-1_HROfII_hmfQVU1P7eJeySCMhrbDrkehL-Xz27Es16QnDKu77yYvrFb-y0s01LYeMym2R8dCTyE7YKra_MgFwKoM94lgoEB&typo=1>
2851 Camino Del Rio South  |  Suite 210  |  San Diego, CA  92108
Fire Protection System Design | Consulting | Planning | Training















From: Micah Davis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 8:55 AM
To: SprinklerForum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Standpipe PRV Question



Good morning, Forum!



I've got a head-scratcher and am interested in the Forum's collective opinion!  
Important project parameters are as follows.



- 42-story high rise with an automatic standpipe

- Seismic Design Category - C

- IBC 2018

- Fire pump supplied by city water supply

- Secondary supply, as required by IBC 403.3.3, is a tank of adequate size

- 305 psi @ 1000 gpm pump sized based on the feed from tank

- Direct-acting pressure reducing valves on each floor



Here is my issue.  If I base my PRV settings on city supply, I cannot get 100 
psi at the remote valves when calculating tank as supply.  If I base my PRV 
settings on tank supply, I am over 175 psi discharge on the valve when 
calculating city as supply.  If I try to get my settings using the city as 
static and the tank as residual pressures, there is no PRV setting that works.



I have my opinions about what I think should happen here, but I want to see 
what the Forum thinks.  I will not bother the group with what the design team 
is suggesting I do.



Micah Davis

Ferguson Fire Design

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,li7vSu59_T21vfTd7Vxec9DHSEwEpuEm2ZASV0YjFYrym1M6kc1fxbkwyNi7NsDIGURZsInzKL74WbYbtG03sDcHBqd53Rww25eNIFyx8FTyTQ,,&typo=1>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,4udTQhMSZwwSigDEOHrilRmnXkm9TnEu_hyWoGkDqJy-HB-btnSj_E7UPeICEW_ga4tQurIDRRwvEb6agUvD6UpPir-E0-Q-7RZPOlwLcZ_Kd-r-YN4qjQ,,&typo=1>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to