Hi Bruno and WG,




I support the adoption of draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization, 
because it provides a useful optimization for SRv6 policy SID 
list.Best,Shengnan ----邮件原文---- 发件人:"bruno.decraene" 
<[email protected]> 收件人:SPRING WG List  <[email protected]> 抄 送: 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]> 发送时间:2025-10-29 
21:32:17 主题:[spring] WG Adoption Call for 
draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01     

Dear WG:


 


This message starts a three-week adoption call for 
draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization, ending on November/19.


 


>From the Abstract:


 


   Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any


   path.  SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions)


   that represent a source-routed policy.  The packets steered into an


   SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR


   Policy.  An SR Policy can be instantiated SR-MPLS and SRv6 data


   planes.


 


   In some use cases, an SRv6 Policy39s SID list ends with the policy


   endpoint39s node SID, and the traffic steered (over policy) already


   ensures that it is taken to the policy endpoint.  In such cases, the


   SID list can be optimized by excluding the endpoint Node SID when


   installing the policy.  This draft specifies procedures to indicate


   whether the endpoint39s node SID needs to be included or excluded when


   installing the SRv6 Policy.


 


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization


 


 


 


Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by


the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or


opposition -- this is not a vote.


 


If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it


explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the


working group willing to work on the document.


 


WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is


whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG39s time to work on and


whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are


particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not


authors of the document.


 


 


Thanks!


 


Bruno (for the Chairs)


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l39expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d39alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.   

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to