Hi WG, I think this document is useful and it helps me to understand the SRv6 based mechanisms for inter-layer network programming. I would like to express my support for adopting this document as a working group item.
=============================================================== JUNFENG ZHAO 赵俊峰 光网络技术和应用研究部 中国信息通信研究院（原工业与信息化部电信研究院）技术与标准研究所 Research Institute of Telecommunications Transmission (RITT), China Academy of Information Communications Technology(CAICT), MIIT TEL: 86-18513835246，86-10-62305054 E-mail: zhaojunf...@ritt.cn, zhaojunf...@caict.ac.cn From: 汪俊芳 Date: 2025-04-10 14:56 To: Alvaro Retana CC: draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming; spring-chairs; spring Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming Hi， I would like to express my support for adopting this document as a working group item. JunFang Wang Email：w...@fiberhome.com Address:No.6, High technology Four road, Wuhan, Hubei Postcode: 430074 http://www.fiberhome.com/ From: Alvaro Retana Date: 2025-04-03 03:05 To: SPRING WG CC: draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming Dear WG: This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming, ending on April/16. From the Abstract: Following the SRv6 Network Programming concept, this document defines SRv6 based mechanisms for inter-layer network programming, which can help to integrate the packet network layer with its underlying layers efficiently. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming/ Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Thanks! Alvaro (for the Chairs)
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
