Hi Alvero The expectation is not that all issues need to be closed. However, the need for End.IL, and hence, the draft needs to be established (for adoption).
Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 at 8:25 PM To: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org> Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org <draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programm...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming On April 8, 2025 at 7:02:44 PM, Zafar Ali wrote: Zafar: Hi! > There was a lot of discussion on this draft, especially on the need for > defining "End.IL", which is the basis of the draft. > As far as I know the discussion was not closed and authors have not > established the need for defining "End.IL". I wrote in the original message: > > WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is > > whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and > > whether this draft represents a good starting point. In other words, there's no expectation for the discussion to be closed. This is not a WG Last Call; it is the start of the WG process. By the same token, WG engagement/discussion will determine whether an adopted draft is eventually published (or not). Based on that and your willingness to continue the discussion, can I assume you're ok with adoption? Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
