Hi Alvaro, I sincerely apologize for my poor communication. We are working on addressing your comments and RtgDir review <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/?gbt=1&index=EacfH6tnRq8e7csm6bsJi8FsOfw>. We appreciate the TSV review and are working on updates. We will share them with you and Loa ASAP.
Kind regards, Greg On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:09 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Authors: > > Please confirm that you read this message and that we’re on the same page. > > The TSV review came in a couple of days ago, so there’s some progress > already. :-) > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On January 6, 2025 at 6:05:40 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.i...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > > Greg/authors: > > Happy New Year! > > > As you know, the WGLC for this document was expected to end on Dec/23 -- > we cc'd the bfd and mpls WGs. However, we only received one non-author > reply. :-( This lack of engagement is worrisome, but it may also be due > to the holidays. > > To move forward, this is the plan: > > - Please address the reviews of the rtg-dir (Loa) and Chair (from me). > > We have requested additional reviews from the Security Directorate and the > Transport Review Team. Please address them as they are received. > > - Consider raising individual issues (from the reviews above or the > comments from the Shepherd (Ketan) or Jeff) to the attention of the WG (in > separate messages) as needed. > > > We will start a new WGLC when the reviews are addressed. > > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
