Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-spring-02-03: Block
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-spring/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) What is the new work to be done and what are the bounds? The charter seems extremely open-ended. With this new charter text and absence of milestones, it isn’t clear what new work the WG will pursue or even what the bounds are to judge that a given topic is in/out of scope (beyond being SR related). The primary bounding text I see is "The SPRING WG is responsible for defining new applications for, and specifying extensions to, Segment Routing technologies. It also serves as a forum to discuss the operational aspects of deploying and managing SR-MPLS networks." What is an example of an application the WG will work on right now? What are the extensions? Am I correct in assuming there is a maintenance role for extensions? What are the first several that need to be worked on known now to motivate this WG? Can those be added as milestones? When is the WG “done”? Can this need for latitude be further explained? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Alvaro Retana for his explanation on trust domains. Thank you for the revision which clarified how new work would be accepted. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
