Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-spring-02-01: Block
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-spring/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Is the Segment Routing Architecture (RFC8402) being revised? By default, Segment Routing operates within a trusted domain and requires the enforcement of a strict boundary to prevent Segment Routing packets from entering the trusted domain [rfc8402]. Some deployments may involve multiple trusted domains and the use of cross/inter-domain segments. Documents which deal with such situations need to include a risk analysis and use mechanisms to validate that the segment list is provided by an authorized entity and has not been modified in transit. Aren’t these “deployment … involving multiple trusted domains” at odd with the security considerations of RFC8402? Is this text rescoping SR from a single trusted domain to effectively the Internet (i.e., what’s the difference between the internet and cross/inter-domain segments)? (2) What is guiding the WG's management of work items? The SPRING WG will manage its specific work items based on WG engagement and successful adoption. What does engagement mean? What does “successful adoption” mean? Is “adoption” referencing IETF processes or “adoption” in the marketplace via implementations? In what way is this a statement that scopes work or WG processes. All items any WG should be adopted based on sufficient energy to work on them. (3) What is the new work to be done and what are the bounds? The charter seems extremely open-ended. With this new charter text and absence of milestones, it isn’t clear what new work the WG will pursue or even what the bounds are to judge that a given topic is in/out of scope (beyond being SR related). When is the WG “done”? Can this need for latitude be further explained? _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
