Thank you Greg for the review comments. Added in Section 4.5 of Revision-17 (also includes comments from Zafar).
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-17.html P.S. Acking for Section 2.1. Thanks, Rakesh (for co-authors) On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 2:34 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rakesh, > please kindly consider my notes: > > - I would propose a brief clarification for Section 4.5.1: > > An SRv6 Policy may suppress the tail-end node SID when adding an L3/L2 > service SID in the packet's segment list to avoid tail-end processing two > incoming SRv6 SIDs. In this case, the Session-Sender may use the segment > list of the SRv6 Policy in the Insert mode (utilizing the node SID of the > Session-Reflector). That is in contrast to the segment list used by data > packets of the SRv6 service in the Encaps mode (using the L3/L2 service SID > on the Session Reflector). > > > - also, since the intended track for the draft is Informational, there > may be no need for the explanation of the use of the normative language in > Section 2.1 > > Regards, > Greg > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 1:31 PM Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi= > 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> +spring. >> >> >> >> Thank you, Amit, for providing the review comments and confirming that >> they have been addressed. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Rakesh >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Amit Dhamija <am...@arrcus.com> >> *Date: *Friday, November 8, 2024 at 1:19 PM >> *To: *Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgan...@cisco.com>, >> draft-ietf-spring-stamp-s...@ietf.org < >> draft-ietf-spring-stamp-s...@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm >> >> Hi Rakesh, >> >> >> >> Thank you for addressing my comment regarding the SR-PM probes over FA. I >> appreciate your prompt action and am glad to confirm that the issue has >> been resolved. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Amit Dhamija. >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> *From: *Dhamija, Amit <amit.dham...@rakuten.com> >> *Date: *Monday, May 29, 2023 at 6:25 AM >> *To: *Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgan...@cisco.com> >> *Subject: *Re: Flex-Algo (SRv6-PM) end-to-end >> >> >> >> Hi Rakesh, >> >> >> >> For SR-PM Probes over FA 0 or any other intent-based FA. Does the >> forwarding follow the specific Algo (shortest path) to determine the >> end-to-end performance? Though, I couldn’t see an reference in the IETF >> draft, mostly everywhere it’s SR Policy and Links. >> >> >> >> Can you confirm? >> >> >> >> Brgds >> >> Amit >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org >> > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
