Dear WG:

This message starts a two-week adoption call for
ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
Abstract:

   This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 networks,
   including the potential threats and the possible mitigation methods.
   The document does not define any new security protocols or extensions
   to existing protocols.


   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security/


Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption
by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support
or opposition -- this is not a vote.

If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it
explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the
working group willing to work on the document.

WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is
whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and
whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are
particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not
authors of the document.

Note that the IESG requested that the WG deliver a document covering
security considerations for SRv6. This document is intended to satisfy
that request.

Thanks!

Alvaro (for the Chairs)

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to