With the only of “IPv6 security” hat, I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document (albeit not ready for publication yet).
I intend to do reviews and suggest text. Regards, -éric PS: replying to the data tracker email without waiting for the chairs’ email about this CfA, what matters is the actual WG consensus and not the communication (especially when many of us are recovering from the IETF-120 week). From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> Date: Wednesday, 31 July 2024 at 19:08 To: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org <draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org>, spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" The SPRING WG has placed draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Alvaro Retana) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security/ _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
