Hi Bruno, team, I support WG adoption of this draft. Interworking is a constant topic with most operators. This draft is key for SRv6 adoption in brownfield environments.
Thanks, …Ianik From: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> <bruno.decra...@orange.com><mailto:<bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 9:27 AM To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org><mailto:<spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking Dear WG: This message starts a three-week adoption call for draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking, ending on August/1rst. (The third week is to account for the busy IETF week.) From the Abstract: This document describes SRv6 and MPLS/SR-MPLS interworking and co- existence procedures. Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking List discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/?q=subject%3A%20draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/?q=subject%3A+draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking> Thanks! Bruno (for the Chairs)
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
