Hi Alvaro, On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 9:19 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On January 7, 2024 at 3:12:20 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > > Dhruv: > > Hi! > > > The document was last presented in IETF 115 by Gyan and has 2 updates > since > > then. It is ready to undergo a WG adoption call. > > > > Note that there are WG documents in PCE and IDR that depend on it. > > Before starting an adoption call, please point us to the IDR document > that depends on this draft. > > Dhruv: The IDR draft is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/ > The datatracker seems to indicate that only the PCE draft depends on > it: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy/referencedby/ > > Dhruv: It is bad that the IDR draft does not yet reference the spring document. It should. I am CCing the authors to make an update :) > > Also, as pce chair, can you please summarize the status of > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-pmtu? > > Dhruv: My opinion and not confirmed with Julian, the PCE WG draft is quite stable and straightforward with creation of a new metric type. It has normative reference to spring draft and thus gated till there is progress in SPRING WG. Thanks! Dhruv > Thanks! > > Alvaro. >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
