Hi Alvaro, thank you for supporting this work and guiding us through the process. My follow-up notes below tagged GIM3>>.
Best regards, Greg On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:16 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On April 17, 2024 at 5:49:09 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Greg: > > > thank you for pointing out to me that although RFC 8402 defines the > > Anycast-SID, that there's no Anycast-SID sub-TLV in the IANA registry > > Sub-TLVs for TLV Types 1, 16, and 21. Thus, we remove that paragraph and > > references. > > Ok. Is there any significant loss in functionality or was the use of > anycast "nice to have"? Just wondering. > GIM>> AFAICS, that is nice to have. Perhaps, someone some day will get to finish it, including with its own Target FEC TLV. > > > > Further more, the authors agreed to changing to the Experimantal track. > > Good. I'll make sure to reflect the change in the datatracker and > when we poll the WG. > > > > Attached, please find the updated version (I assume that idnit's warning > > about an outdated reference to draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed is > transitionary > > and get fixed in time). > > It will get fixed when you reference the current version. ;-) > GIM3>> I guess that the datatracker's latency is more than 24 hours ;) > > > > If you agree, I'll upload it instantaneously. > > Please go ahead. > GIM3>> Done! > > I'll start moving the document forward. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
