Hi Alvaro & WG members,




As an operator,  I think there will be no intermediate nodes performing SRv6 
packet upper layer checksum in our network deployment. Currently, there is no 
problem with C-SID deployment. I feel that there is no need to change the text 
in Section 6.5.




Best Regards

Yisong











 



发件人: Alvaro Retana

时间: 2024/04/03(星期三)01:41

收件人: SPRING WG List;

抄送人: spring-chairs;

主题: Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums 
(draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)      

[Moving this message up on everyone’s mailbox.] 


  

Dear WG: 


  

We have received no replies to this request.  If no changes are needed to §6.5 
then that is ok, but if you have a different opinion please speak up. 


  

Thanks! 


  

Alvaro. 
 

On March 28, 2024 at 8:04:30 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.i...@gmail.com) wrote:  

 

 


 Section 6.5 of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression describes the behavior 
when an originating node inside an SRv6 domain creates a packet with a C-SID as 
the final destination. This description differs from the text in Section 8.1 of 
RFC8200.   
 
 We plan to send the draft to the 6man WG for review and explicitly highlight 
this difference.  
 
 Please comment on the text in Section 6.5. Does anything need to be added, 
deleted, changed, or clarified?  
 
 We want to ask for feedback soon; please send comments on this topic by April 
5th. 
 
 Thanks! 
 
 Alvaro. 
 -- for spring-chairs 
 
    

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to