Hello,
I have read the
draft<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-08>,
and I do not have any technical comments on it.
At the same time, I wonder why its intended status appears as "Standard Track":
1. The draft does not define any new mechanisms in the data plane or control
plane
2. Usage of the IETF keywords denoting requirement levels looks too
vague/generic to me, e.g.
* The details of the underlay network MUST NOT be exposed to third
parties, to prevent attacks aimed at exploiting shared network resources
* If there are related link advertisements, then consistency MUST be
assured across that set of advertisements
IMHO and FWIW the draft describes how resource-aware forwarding can be achieved
using various already-defined SR mechanisms.
Have the authors and/or the WG considered changing the intended status of the
draft to "Informational"?
Regards,
Sasha
Disclaimer
This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
