Thank you 😊 Cheng
-----Original Message----- From: John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 3:43 PM To: Cheng Li <c...@huawei.com> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; james.n.guich...@futurewei.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com Subject: Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-19: (with COMMENT) Hi Cheng, Sounds good, and the diff looks good, thanks. One further comment: > On Nov 29, 2023, at 5:46 AM, Cheng Li <c...@huawei.com> wrote: > > [Cheng] In the beginning, we have some text related to SRv6, but Bruno > suggested to delete it to keep this draft clean, so we deleted it. > But don't worry, we do have a draft to define the SRv6 path segment: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!EyweIhGkWyswBHWXkNNCv__q80cD59bOXRDrfpOEQLYkNS2STlk2PorPwCuBFc4uT1R1rfSh$ > So the possibility is open for sure. Once we finish this draft, we can > promote that draft. Thank you for your suggestion! That's great. As I was reviewing the present document, my concern was that your definition of the PSID term might exclude non-MPLS uses. But since you're working on both documents, I trust you to get it right! :-) --John _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
