Dear authors, A couple of questions: 1. Why not decouple the IPv6 path tracing option from SRv6? It does not seem to be strictly SRv6 related. You could potentially define the relevant SRv6 endpoint behavior in a separate draft. 2. Would it be possible to use the ICMPv6 Loopback message with an SRH and the path tracing option? That would mean that the ICMPv6 Loopback reply includes the original SRH of the Loopback message, and also the path tracing information of the original Loopback message. In this context "ICMPv6 Loopback" is as defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcb-intarea-icmpv6-loopback/
Cheers, Tal. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
