Hi Spring working group: I’d like to bring this question to the list according to a recent discussion in IDR: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Kr9SZ8z-gN8py8b4aIkONPi7rLI/.
I noticed that, a Popping behavior on SRH when SL==0 together with a further encapsulation procedure may be useful not only in the above IDR case, but also the same in SRv6 Binding SID. Unfortunately it seemed not careful enough in RFC8986 to get this right ---- the pseudo code in section 4.13 of RFC8986 did not pop the SRH with SL==0 when it could. To make it more concrete, let's suppose the PSP pseudo code in 4.16.1.2 is added after S14 of pseudo code in 4.13. How do you think ? Thanks, Jingrong 本邮件及其附件可能含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
