Hi Suresh, thank you for your explanation. Regards, Greg
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023, 12:47 Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krish...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Greg, > There is a verified Errata on RFC8754 to mention the Segment List since > it is not something RFC8200 defines. > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7102 > > Thanks > Suresh > > On Aug 9, 2023, at 2:30 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Authors and Chairs, > I have a clarification question and appreciate your consideration. > It seems to me that the proposed text updates either RFC 8754 or RFC 8200 > where the Segments Left field is defined as: > > - RFC 8754: > > Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. > > > - RFC 8200: > > Segments Left 8-bit unsigned integer. Number of route > > segments remaining, i.e., the number of > explicitly > > listed intermediate nodes still to be visited > > before reaching the final destination. > > At the same time, the proposed update does not include any reference to > RFC 8200 or RFC 8754. > Hence is my question How do you see the relationship between the proposed > new text and RFCs 8200 and 8754? > > Regards, > Greg > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 8:00 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > >> Issue #3 in the datatracker reads >> >> The definition for the SegmentsLeft field of the SRH as currently stated >> in [RFC8754][RFC8200] no longer holds true in the presence of C-SIDs. This >> definition needs to be updated to still hold true in the presence of C-SIDs. >> >> The response from the document editors reads: >> >> Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. Specifically, for the >> SRH, the number of unprocessed 128-bit entries in the Segment List. >> >> >> Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution >> sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be >> addressed. If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This >> call is open for two weeks, through August 22. >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
