Dear WG， I support this adoption. It is a good idea to assign SRv6 locators through DHCPv6.
Best Regards, Liyan ----邮件原文----发件人：Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com>收件人：spring <spring@ietf.org>抄 送: draft-cheng-spring-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp <draft-cheng-spring-distribute-srv6-locator-by-d...@ietf.org>,"spring-cha...@ietf.org" <spring-cha...@ietf.org>发送时间：2023-07-05 20:00:03主题：[spring] spring WG Adoption Call fordraft-cheng-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcpDear WG:This message starts a two-week adoption call fordraft-cheng-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp, ending on July/19.It "describes the method of assigning locators to SRv6 Endpointsthrough DHCPv6". https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-spring-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp/Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoptionby the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicatesupport or opposition -- this is not a vote.If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state itexplicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in theworking group willing to work on the document.WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question iswhether you agree the proposal is worth the WG39s time to work on andwhether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs areparticularly interested in hearing the opinion of people who are notauthors of the document.Thanks!Alvaro (for the Chairs)_______________________________________________spring mailing listspring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/springSubject：[spring] spring WG Adoption Call fordraft-cheng-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcpDear WG:This message starts a two-week adoption call fordraft-cheng-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp, ending on July/19.It "describes the method of assigning locators to SRv6 Endpointsthrough DHCPv6". https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-spring-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp/Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoptionby the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicatesupport or opposition -- this is not a vote.If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state itexplicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in theworking group willing to work on the document.WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question iswhether you agree the proposal is worth the WG39s time to work on andwhether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs areparticularly interested in hearing the opinion of people who are notauthors of the document.Thanks!Alvaro (for the Chairs)_______________________________________________spring mailing listspring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
