Robert,
The default and CS topologies would each advertise their own resource-aware 
Node and Adj-SIDs, and these SID’s would be resource-aware with strictly 
separated resources.
Physical links would be shared, but “soft” resources (queues, buffers etc.) 
would not.


Regards,
Sasha

From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 6:34 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein <alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>
Cc: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) <cschm...@cisco.com>; spring@ietf.org; 
Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>; Stewart Bryant <stewart.bry...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [spring] A technical concern regarding 
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy-00

Hi,

I have probably did not say it explicitly, but the default topology would use 
its own resources – and experience its own problems, strictly orthogonal to 
whatever happens in the dedicated CS topology.
IMHO and FWIW this could be treated as a possible approach for implementing the 
(in)famous “network slicing”.

Isn't the default topo an underlay for any custom topology ? You seems to think 
that default topology can function "in parallel", but this is not how I 
understand it.

As for “circuit switching over connectionless paradigm” – well, TDM circuit 
emulation has been standardized by the IETF years ago, has been quite widely 
deployed, and, AFAIK, is still growing as more operators try to scrap their SDH 
networks.

Yeh happened to be for a number of years on a customer side using such an 
"invention" and my resistance to the subject draft is coming from this (bad) 
experience.

Sure it is cool for operators ... not so for customers.

I even wrote a draft one time trying to detect the hidden problems by such 
innovations:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-turaga-mpls-test-labels-01.txt<https://clicktime.symantec.com/15siFAWXYQbeXVKrxySKo?h=x62Izj8EA1ochFQn_IOjg5vppMp6uauU1mfZg75quk4=&u=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-turaga-mpls-test-labels-01.txt>

Thx,
R.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others 
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been 
automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber 
resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security 
awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. 
Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, 
human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a 
more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to