Dear WG, strong support from my side.
While I would not advise to run an SR enabled network to mainly carry circuit-style traffic, I do think this approach might be a valuable technology to further consolidate multi-service network, esp in cases when plain packet traffic seriously exceeds the circuit-style traffic.
Bets regards, Martin Am 16.05.23 um 16:04 schrieb IETF Secretariat:
The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/ Comment: This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft. Please speak up if you support or object to WG adoption. Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the start of the process. The basic question is whether you agree that the subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include explanation for your view. Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a vote but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG Chairs) We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
