Hi Huaimo, Thanks for drawing the attention on this document.
Here are some review comments for your consideration. 1. In section 3.1: A Repair List RL is obtained based on the path. It is one of the followings: o RL = <Mirror SID> if the path does not go through PE A; Or o RL = <S1, ..., Sn, Mirror SID> if the path goes through PE A, where <S1, ..., Sn> is the TI-LFA Repair List to PE B computed by P1. [Jie] It is recommended that PE B be used as the anycast node of PE A to calculate the backup next hop of PE A. (Actually, the shortest path from P1 to PE B does not need bypass PE A. Only the backup next hop needs to meet LFA requirements, that is, RL = <Mirror SID>.) 2：When IGP convergence is complete after PE3 fails, the route from P1 to PE3 needs to be deleted. As a result, P1 does not have a PE3`s backup path. At this time, PE1 has not converged. Therefore, a slow deletion mechanism is required for the locator route of PE3. Hope this helps. Best regards, Jie From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Huaimo Chen Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 10:56 AM To: spring@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Request for review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection Hi Everyone, Would you mind reviewing this draft? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/ Thanks much. Best Regards, Huaimo ________________________________ From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.c...@futurewei.com<mailto:huaimo.c...@futurewei.com>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 12:31 PM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Request for review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection Hi Everyone, Would you mind reviewing this draft? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/ Thanks much. Best Regards, Huaimo
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
