Hi Dhruv,
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 12:27 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Suresh,
>
> Thanks for taking the comments into consideration. Snip to just two points...
>
>
>
>> - Do we need to add some text on what happens if the address block assigned
>> by IANA is not used in the received IPv6 packet?
>
> Dhruv: Any thoughts on this?
This block is not mandatory to use. The packet will be processed as any other
IPv6 packet would. Is there something specific you are worried about?
>
>> - This text "This would be useful in identifying and potentially filtering
>> packets at the edges of the SR Domains as described in Section 4.1.". But
>> section 4.1 of this I-D does not have any text for this! Do you mean some
>> other document?
>
> This is in reference to the following text in 4.1
> " In this case, to allow the SR domain to fail closed, some form of filtering
> based on the LOC part of the SRv6 SID is required as relying purely on the
> presence of an SRH will not be sufficient.”
>
> Please let me know if I can clarify this further.
>
>
> Dhruv: I got confused because section 4.1 is meant to be only about C-SID. My
> suggestion would be to avoid the reference and just put the relevant sentence
> there for emphasis and clarity.
Sounds good. Will do.
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
