Hi Reshad
thanks for your comments.
Yes, for the decription of S-BFD echo, it's a writing mistake
We will update the draft to control packet.
Best Wishes
Lihao
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Reshad Rahman
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 9:08 AM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org; jh...@pfrc.org; linchangwang (RD)
<linchangwang.04...@h3c.com>
Cc: jiangweny...@chinamobile.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Discuss on draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
Hi,
Thank you for keeping the BFD WG in the loop. I don't have any comments on the
correlation, will leave that to SPRING.
My only question for now is regarding the use of S-BFD echo packets. RFC7880
recommends to also use S-BFD control packets when using S-BFD echo because a
transit node could u-turn the packet. And if the packet is being delivered
anyway to the control plane (as per 4.2), control packets should be used
instead.
Regards,
Reshad.
On Monday, March 21, 2022, 10:32:00 PM EDT, linchangwang
<linchangwang.04...@h3c.com<mailto:linchangwang.04...@h3c.com>> wrote:
Hi WG ,Chairs:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.
There is no meeting for bfd in IETF-113, we will present this draft in spring
WG:
March 25, 2022 12:30-14:30 Friday Afternoon session I (UTC+1)
o S-BFD Path Consistency over SRv6[ 5 minutes ]
S-BFD could be used to monitor SRv6 Policy, a session associated with a
segment list.
Path inconsistency may cause false positive issue.
To the issue, The consistency of forward and reverse path of the same session
should be guaranteed.
This draft describes how to realize the bidirectional path consistency of
packet when monitoring SRv6 policy by S-BFD.
How to correlate bidirectional path?
1. Correlating bidirectional path using Path Segment
2. Path Segment is defined to identify an SR path in
[draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment]
3. [draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment] extends BGP SR Policy
4. Using path segment and reverse path segment to establish a mapping table
Using the mapping table to get segment list by reverse Path segment
S-BFD Initiator procedure:
1. Encapsulating the segment list associated with SBFD-session session to
SRH
2. Encapsulating the path segment of segment list in SRH, and set SRH.P-Flag
S-BFD reflector procedure:
1. If SRH.P-flag is set, extracts the path segment (i.e. SID-Path-A1)of the
forward path from SRH
2.Get segment list of reverse path by the path segment as a reverse path
segment from mapping table
3. Encapsulating response packet with the reverse segment list
Any comments and suggestions are greatly welcome.
Best regards,
Changwang Lin
发件人: linchangwang (RD)
发送时间: 2022年3月2日 23:17
收件人: jiangweny...@chinamobile.com<mailto:jiangweny...@chinamobile.com>;
chengweiqiang
(chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com<mailto:chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com>); lihao
(02566, RD); 'rtg-...@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-...@ietf.org>'
主题: Re: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00.txt
Hi WG,
We have just posted a new draft about sbfd path consistency over SRv6 in BFDWG.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.
Any comments and suggestions are greatly welcome.
Best regards,
Changwang Lin
发件人: I-D-Announce
[mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org>] 代表
internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
发送时间: 2022年3月2日 19:33
收件人: i-d-annou...@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>
主题: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
Title : S-BFD Path Consistency over SRv6
Authors : Changwang Lin
Weiqiang Cheng
Wenying Jiang
Filename : draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00.txt
Pages : 12
Date : 2022-03-02
Abstract:
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) can be used to monitor
paths between nodes. Seamless BFD (S-BFD) provides a simplified
mechanism which is suitable for monitoring of paths that are setup
dynamically and on a large scale network. In SRv6, when a headend
use S-BFD to monitor the segment list/CPath of SRv6 Policy, the
forward path of S-BFD packet is indicated by segment list, the
reverse path of BFD packet is via the shortest path from the
reflector back to the initiator (headend) as determined by routing.
The forward path and reverse path of S-BFD packet are likely
inconsistent going through different intermediate nodes or links.
This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6/
There is also an htmlized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
i-d-annou...@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件！
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C,
which is
intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use
of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total
or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
