Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the efforts on this specification. This might be due to my lack of expertise on SR policy but it is not clear to me how to resolve policy conflicts where preferences and priority are same for policies. It would be nice if you point me information I am missing as I could not resolve it by reading this specification. This might be that the scenario I am having in mind never occurs. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
